H. A. Dixon and Freed-Hardeman College

Not much secondary literature has been published through the years about H. A. Dixon (1904-1969). But I'm willing to argue that Dixon's successful presidency at Freed-Hardeman College (from 1950 to 1969), was absolutely crucial to the survival and growth of the school. Without Dixon's credibility, integrity, and stalwart leadership, there is no telling what might have become of Freed-Hardeman, located in Henderson, Tennessee.

In 1950, many thousands of people knew and loved N. B. Hardeman, Dixon's predecessor. Hardeman's long list of friends, some of them quite wealthy, had kept the college financially sound, with hundreds of students in attendance over many years. However, due to a crisis of confidence and the abrupt end of Hardeman's presidency in 1950, when Dixon became the next president, the college was in uncharted waters.

Apparently, Hardeman, who turned 76 that year, was distracted by a student protest and opposition at the college that bore his name. This impacted the financial well-being of F-HC. In his article on "Freed-Hardeman University," Mark W. Hamilton was right to say that by 1950, N. B. Hardeman had "placed the school on a sound financial footing" (Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement, 344). That was true as far as it went. Yet, there is more to the story.

During Hardeman's presidency, money had been a critical issue, as it always is especially for private schools. And Hardeman had done a great job of raising money for the college. But it certainly seems that in 1950, questions about what was going on at Henderson and uncertainty about the school's future meant that the flow of financial support for the college slowed to a trickle. This seems to be the only explanation for something Louise Cowan Dixon, H. A.'s widow, told me in 1988. She said that when her husband became the new president of the school, he was shocked to learn that the college's operating fund contained a grand total of $2,000.

She also said that, although H. A. Dixon became the new president under circumstances nobody foresaw, Hardeman had on more than one occasion suggested to Dixon that he should be the next president of the school. Hardeman's judgment was sound. When Dixon assumed his new role, very few people among the Churches of Christ enjoyed the same level of admiration and respect. Very few people could have taken on the mantle of N. B. Hardeman to advance Freed-Hardeman over the next nineteen years as H. A. Dixon did. Freed-Hardeman was fortunate to have had him ready and able to take on that task.

What the Bible Says About the Future of Your Body (2)

In John 11, Jesus finally makes it to Bethany where Lazarus had died a few days earlier. Prior to raising Lazarus from the dead, Jesus has an interesting discussion with Martha, a sister of Lazarus: "Jesus said to her, 'Your brother will rise again.' Martha answered, 'I know he will rise again, in the resurrection at the last day' " (John 11:24-25).

In her response, Martha refers to an expectation about the end of the world, one that was commonly accepted by many Jews of her day. As Martha understood it, when God brought down the curtain of history, all the dead would be raised. (According to Mark 12:18, a group called the Sadducees did not accept this doctrine).

In John 5, Jesus himself endorsed the view that Martha took. He said that a time is coming "when all who are in their graves . . . will come out -- those who have done good will rise to live, and those who have done evil will rise to be condemned" (John 5:28-29). Clearly, this language refers to the end of time and the final judgment of all who have lived.

Now, this is very different from several stories found the Bible where someone was brought back from the dead. That is, they were resuscitated or restored to life. Here is a list of those instances:

Old Testament

1. Widow of Zarephath’s son — raised by Elijah
   1 Kings 17:17–24

2. Shunammite woman’s son — raised by Elisha
   2 Kings 4:18–37

3. Man revived when touching Elisha’s bones
   2 Kings 13:20–21

New Testament

4. Jairus’s daughter — raised by Jesus
   Mark 5:21–43; Matthew 9:18–26; Luke 8:40–56

5. Widow of Nain’s son — raised by Jesus
   Luke 7:11–17

6. Lazarus of Bethany — raised by Jesus
   John 11:1–44

7. Tabitha (Dorcas) — raised by Peter
   Acts 9:36–42

8. Eutychus — revived by Paul after falling from a window
   Acts 20:7–12

One other passage, Matthew 27:52-53, tells of a large number of people, unnamed and described collectively, who, when Jesus died, "were raised to life." They went into Jerusalem, and "appeared to many people." It is a unique scenario in Scripture, . . . as was the death of Jesus. 

However we speak about these events, we should not refer to them as examples of resurrection. Why? Because all of these people were brought back to this life. They were not immortal. They were not raised to new and unending life. Not one of them was resurrected. That has happened only once: in the case of Jesus of Nazareth.

Think of it this way. Of all the people in the passages listed above, how many of them are still alive? Answer: none. They all died again. Incidentally, there's a passage somewhere in the writings of C. S. Lewis where he remarks that it must have been difficult for Lazarus to have been raised from the dead: it meant that, knowing what it was to die, he eventually had to do his dying all over again.

But not Jesus. Romans 6:9 says, "For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no longer has mastery over him." Unlike Lazarus, Jesus did not have to do his dying all over again. In fact, Paul insists that he cannot die again. That's because on the third day after his humiliating execution, Jesus was not brought back to this life. He was not resuscitated. Instead, he was resurrected.

But what does it mean to have a resurrected body? And what does that say about the future of your body? More about that another time.

What the Bible Says About the Future of Your Body (1)

The notion that human beings are really just souls who temporarily have bodies is something I sometimes hear. But it flies in the face of the Gospel's promise of resurrection.

According to the Bible, you and I do not have bodies. We are bodies, among other things. I certainly believe that human life transcends, or is more than, bodily existence. Christians after all are not materialists.

At the same time, the assertion or suggestion that your body is nothing more than your "earth suit" (something I once heard at a funeral) or that life following our current mortal existence is immaterial life (a notion that seems to be in the ether of many Christian groups) is much more Greek philosophy than it is biblical, Christian doctrine.

More about this another time.